Hi guys,
for a common scientific undrstanding
no bug insect wise, may be mroe than 2cm in diameter.
This is becuase insects breathe via spiracles, that supply oxygen direct to repsiring tissue
if insect diameterss are greater than 2cm than respiing tisuse will not be able to receive oxygen quickly enough
insects that are over 2cm in diameer, e.g. rhino and stag beetles are largely composed of casing and chitinous exposkleteon which does not respire.
Fossil records show insects like dragon flies large over 2cm in diameter some with wingspans larger than 50 inches
The question is, how did they supply thier cells with oxygen?
Would this indicate that the pressure of oxygen was vastly greater allowing for easier oxygen loading.
Would it also explain why dino's were able to breathe, seeing as many large ones had nostrils no biggerthan a horses.
Point 2
If the size of dragon fly is determinable by oxygen pressures, and if they were bred in such an experimen
on that premise: and rapidly increased in size
is it therefore scientifically theroetical to suggest that the demise in creatures this size does not take milions of years, (seeing as to breed them under the said conditions did not take millions of years)
i.e. how do we explain a creature not taking millions of years to return to its similar sie in an ancient fossil, whre it's accepted that it took millions of years to evolve to its smaller state.
Of course no such breeding has taken place
but what are the implications for evolution for points 1 and 2?
tylextra the beetle theory is from evolutionists,
and like i say, beetle larger than 2cm in diameter have a large amount of casing, which does not account for repsiring tissue!!!
stop partially selecting all the facts!
Answer by Yahweh's Toaster
Science goes in the science section.
What do you think? Answer below!
Orignal From: It's a creationist bug's life?
No comments:
Post a Comment